OUR CONSTITUTION SPECIFIES THE REQUIREMENTS TO BECOME PRESIDENT. ANYONE WHO “TAKES OFFICE” AND WHO DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS WILL NOT BE PRESIDENT.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS NOW IN A “CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS.”

BARACK OBAMA IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES AS IS REQUIRED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND HAS IN FACT USURPED THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT WITH THE COMPLICITY OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, CONGRESS, THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE OF THE PARTY.

WELCOME TO ONE-PARTY RULE. NO, IT'S NOT THE DEMOCRAT PARTY ... IT'S A NEW MERGED “REPUBLICANDEMOCRAT” PARTY. THIS AFFECTS YOU AND YOUR FUTURE.

You WILL see a number of shocking events take place in the months ahead. This will include: exoneration or pardon of the governor of Illinois and other corrupt government officials; “generated crises,” generated to gain sympathy for and distract attention away from the new one-party government; targeted censorship of the Internet, newspapers and broadcasters who do not accept the merged “Republicandemocrat” Party line; threats and intimidations aimed at the livelihoods of people who know the truth; a number of unlawful arrests of protesters and others exercising their First Amendment rights; widespread illegal spying on private citizens including illegal wiretaps, searches and investigations executed against ordinary U.S. Citizens who do not accept one-party rule; gradual “suspension” of the Second Amendment leading to its elimination; a torrent of new federal laws aimed at private U.S. Citizens and businesses; illegal government seizures of private property under false pretenses; a “global warming emergency” declared, with special taxes and penalties imposed on U.S. Citizens, power companies, local governments and small businesses; rapidly accelerating Socialism; disregard for parts of the United States Constitution leading to complete suspension of what's left of the Constitution; greatly increased funding for now outmoded digital television broadcasting with emphasis on PBS to promote the Party line and values harmful to the best interests of U.S. Citizens and the U.S. economy; a greatly increased role for the United Nations into the everyday rights and affairs of private U.S. Citizens and local governments; total amnesty for people who entered the United States illegally and in many cases, continued to disregard U.S. laws afterward;  the creation of a large, Constitutionally unlawful central military police force to enforce the Party line; return of the national draft - conscripting teenagers and young adults into unlawful paramilitary service against their fellow U.S. Citizens; declaration of a “national emergency” or emergencies; marshal law in specific areas, then nationwide.

A GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE CONDUCTED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS, BUT IT IS ... NONE OF THESE CASES WILL EVER BE GIVEN A FAIR, FULL HEARING IN OPEN COURT. HERE IS THE PROOF - CASES WHICH ARE ON THE DOCKET OF OR WERE FILED AT THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT BUT KEPT HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC:

[1] BERG v. OBAMA: U.S. Supreme Court docket No. 08-570 (from Case No. 08-4340 at the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals) THIS IS THE “ORIGINAL“ CASE DISPUTING BARACK OBAMA'S ELIGIBILITY TO BE U.S. PRESIDENT AND HAS BEEN IN PROGRESS SINCE AUGUST 2008. This case was reviewed by a conference (closed-door meeting) of all nine U.S. Supreme Court justices on January 9, 2009. At least five of the nine justices determined that the case should not be heard in an open session of the U.S. Supreme Court at this time, and the case was sent back to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals for judgment.

A second aspect of the case was scheduled to be heard at another closed-door U.S.S.C conference on Friday January 16, 2009. The results of this meeting are expected to be issued in a report during the week of January 19th.

The case originally moved to the Supreme Court from the original Federal over an issue of “standing,” which determines the circumstances under which a case may be brought to court. As it stands now, Mr. Berg's question of “standing” in this case became moot on January 8, 2009 when the results of the December 15, 2008 Presidential election* were reviewed and certified by the U.S. Congress. Legal experts say that the case should move forward at this time in open court, unless for some reason the matter of Barack Obama's birth is a matter of national secrecy, unable to be revealed to the taxpayers.  *(The actual United States Presidential election was held on December 15, 2008. If you thought it was November 4th, please review this website for an explanation of the election process and Electoral College: click here.)

[2] DONOFRIO v. WELLS: U.S. Supreme Court docket No. 08A407, (from Case No. AM-0153-08T2 at the New Jersey Appellate Division) Donofrio v. Wells entered a conference of all nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. The motion requesting a stay of the New Jersey general election ballot for November 4, 2008 was denied by at least five supreme court justices in the conference. This order was listed under “pending cases” on the Supreme Court of the United States' orders list of December 8, 2008.

[3] WROTNOWSKI V. BYSIEWICZ: U.S. Supreme Court docket No. 08A469, (from Case No. SC 18264 at the Connecticut Supreme Court) The case was discussed in a closed door meeting of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices, and at least five of the justices decided that this case will NOT be heard in open court. Order issued Monday, December 15, 2008: “The application for stay and/or injunction addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court is denied.” This order was listed under “PENDING CASES.”

Here's a footnote: This case was first denoted as “denied,” but evidence indicates this was not with the permission of the justice originally  involved. In fact, the case was resubmitted in person and is listed under the same U.S. Supreme Court docket number (No. 08A469). This is a similar situation to No. 08A407 (Donofrio v. Wells), which was denoted as “denied,” but apparently in error.

[4] LIGHTFOOT v. BOWEN: Gail Lightfoot, et al. v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State from Supreme Court of California Case No. S168690  This case was filed in the United States Supreme Court December 11, 2008 after moving through the California Supreme Court the week before. THIS CASE IS THE FOURTH PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY CASE WITHIN TWO MONTHS TO MAKE IT TO THE DOCKET OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT. The case was reviewed by the entire U.S. Supreme Court in a closeddoor session on January 23, 2009, and is was decided by at least five of the nine justices that the case would not be heard in open court.

This case is gaining attention from worldwide news media (with the notable exception of the so-called "mainstream media" in the United States). Lightfoot v. Bowen is so explosive that it has generated slanderous attacks on the plaintiff's lead attorney by at least one U.S. media outlet.

ADDITIONAL CASES ARE HEADING FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, AND SOME OF THESE CASES ARE BEING FILED BY MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES WHO WILL BE UNABLE TO LEGALLY TAKE ORDERS FROM A USURPER. MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE FROM DR. EDWIN VIEIRA.

The docket links above go directly to the website of the United States Supreme court, www.SupremeCourtUS.gov. Case links go to our individual pages for each case.